↓ Skip to main content

Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence.

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 465)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
79 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence.
Published in
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, May 2020
DOI 10.1037/law0000223
Authors

David DeMatteo, Stephen D. Hart, Kirk Heilbrun, Marcus T. Boccaccini, Mark D. Cunningham, Kevin S. Douglas, Joel A. Dvoskin, John F. Edens, Laura S. Guy, Daniel C. Murrie, Randy K. Otto, Ira K. Packer, Thomas J. Reidy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#492,281
of 21,011,122 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#20
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,089
of 365,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,011,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them