You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1037/law0000223 |
| Authors |
David DeMatteo, Stephen D. Hart, Kirk Heilbrun, Marcus T. Boccaccini, Mark D. Cunningham, Kevin S. Douglas, Joel A. Dvoskin, John F. Edens, Laura S. Guy, Daniel C. Murrie, Randy K. Otto, Ira K. Packer, Thomas J. Reidy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Canada | 7 | 11% |
| Chile | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 41% |
| Scientists | 23 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#775,680
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#32
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,210
of 412,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them