↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinics, January 2020
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Henriques Jacomo, Aline Teixeira Alves, Adélia Lucio, Patrícia Azevedo Garcia, Dayanne Cristina Ramos Lorena, João Batista de Sousa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 28 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Unspecified 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 33 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,275,791
of 21,241,420 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#407
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,270
of 366,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#33
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,241,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.