↓ Skip to main content

Multi-region assessment of pharmaceutical exposures and predicted effects in USA wadeable urban-gradient streams

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-region assessment of pharmaceutical exposures and predicted effects in USA wadeable urban-gradient streams
Published in
PLoS ONE, January 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0228214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Bradley, Celeste A. Journey, Daniel T. Button, Daren M. Carlisle, Bradley J. Huffman, Sharon L. Qi, Kristin M. Romanok, Peter C. Van Metre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 29%
Engineering 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,123,663
of 17,377,895 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#16,259
of 164,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,642
of 334,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#36
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,377,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.