↓ Skip to main content

The Burden of the Past: Problems of Historical Perception in Japan-Korea Relations

Overview of attention for article published in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 162)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Burden of the Past: Problems of Historical Perception in Japan-Korea Relations
Published in
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, January 2020
DOI 10.1093/irap/lcaa002
Authors

Kei Koga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,810,120
of 15,575,185 outputs
Outputs from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#18
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,863
of 289,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,575,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them