You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of unexpected in-hospital deaths: a root cause analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient Safety in Surgery, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1754-9493-5-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lawrence A Lynn, J Paul Curry |
Abstract |
Respiratory alarm monitoring and rapid response team alerts on hospital general floors are based on detection of simple numeric threshold breaches. Although some uncontrolled observation trials in select patient populations have been encouraging, randomized controlled trials suggest that this simplistic approach may not reduce the unexpected death rate in this complex environment. The purpose of this review is to examine the history and scientific basis for threshold alarms and to compare thresholds with the actual pathophysiologic patterns of evolving death which must be timely detected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 21% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 171 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 20% |
Other | 28 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 36 | 21% |
Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 39% |
Engineering | 21 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,543,559
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#40
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,441
of 196,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them