↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, January 2001
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-1-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agata Czyz, Marcin Los, Borys Wrobel, Grzegorz Wegrzyn

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 32%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 24%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,347,379
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#326
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,097
of 328,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them