↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, January 2001
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-1-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agata Czyz, Marcin Los, Borys Wrobel, Grzegorz Wegrzyn

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 32%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 11 16%
Other 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,887,789
of 15,561,399 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#324
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,332
of 288,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,561,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them