↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evaluation of a self-propelling bio-inspired needle in single- and multi-layered phantoms

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental evaluation of a self-propelling bio-inspired needle in single- and multi-layered phantoms
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-56403-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Scali, P. Breedveld, D. Dodou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,598,026
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#79,227
of 125,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,036
of 457,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,747
of 4,336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.