↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evaluation of a self-propelling bio-inspired needle in single- and multi-layered phantoms

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental evaluation of a self-propelling bio-inspired needle in single- and multi-layered phantoms
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-56403-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Scali, P. Breedveld, D. Dodou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,718,585
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#53,906
of 89,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,939
of 328,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.