↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
223 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
320 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Ding, Li Wang, Wanhong Ma, Hangyong He

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 502 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Student > Postgraduate 51 10%
Researcher 46 9%
Student > Master 37 7%
Other 103 21%
Unknown 160 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Neuroscience 6 1%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 27 5%
Unknown 174 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#234,466
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#106
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,035
of 475,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.