You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lin Ding, Li Wang, Wanhong Ma, Hangyong He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 42 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 20 | 9% |
Mexico | 12 | 5% |
France | 9 | 4% |
Canada | 7 | 3% |
Brazil | 6 | 3% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 1% |
Chile | 3 | 1% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 90 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 160 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 17% |
Scientists | 14 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 502 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 53 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 52 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 51 | 10% |
Researcher | 46 | 9% |
Student > Master | 37 | 7% |
Other | 103 | 21% |
Unknown | 160 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 1% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 1% |
Engineering | 6 | 1% |
Other | 27 | 5% |
Unknown | 174 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#234,466
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#106
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,035
of 475,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.