↓ Skip to main content

The Geography of Inequality: How Land Use Regulation Produces Segregation

Overview of attention for article published in American Political Science Review, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,522)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
405 tweeters
reddit
2 Redditors
Title
The Geography of Inequality: How Land Use Regulation Produces Segregation
Published in
American Political Science Review, February 2020
DOI 10.1017/s0003055419000844
Authors

JESSICA TROUNSTINE

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 405 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#43,670
of 14,366,071 outputs
Outputs from American Political Science Review
#6
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#898
of 175,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Political Science Review
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,366,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.