You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003857.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mostafa Metwally, Grace Raybould, Ying C Cheong, Andrew W Horne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 29% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 102 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 37% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 103 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,738,254
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,746
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,867
of 474,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.