↓ Skip to main content

Improving vaccination uptake among adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving vaccination uptake among adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011895.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leila H Abdullahi, Benjamin M Kagina, Valantine Ngum Ndze, Gregory D Hussey, Charles S Wiysonge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 35 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,893,545
of 16,229,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,558
of 11,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,560
of 311,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,229,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.