You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-63 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cécile Pino, Isabelle Boutron, Philippe Ravaud |
Abstract |
The registration of clinical trials has been promoted to prevent publication bias and increase research transparency. Despite general agreement about the minimum amount of information needed for trial registration, we lack clear guidance on descriptions of non-pharmacologic interventions in trial registries. We aimed to evaluate the quality of registry descriptions of non-pharmacologic interventions assessed in ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patient education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Argentina | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Librarian | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 24% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 50% |
Psychology | 7 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |