You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0803-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrich Bick, Rubina M. Trimboli, Alexandra Athanasiou, Corinne Balleyguier, Pascal A. T. Baltzer, Maria Bernathova, Krisztina Borbély, Boris Brkljacic, Luca A. Carbonaro, Paola Clauser, Enrico Cassano, Catherine Colin, Gul Esen, Andrew Evans, Eva M. Fallenberg, Michael H. Fuchsjaeger, Fiona J. Gilbert, Thomas H. Helbich, Sylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner, Michel Herranz, Karen Kinkel, Fleur Kilburn-Toppin, Christiane K. Kuhl, Mihai Lesaru, Marc B. I. Lobbes, Ritse M. Mann, Laura Martincich, Pietro Panizza, Federica Pediconi, Ruud M. Pijnappel, Katja Pinker, Simone Schiaffino, Tamar Sella, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Anne Tardivon, Chantal Van Ongeval, Matthew G. Wallis, Sophia Zackrisson, Gabor Forrai, Julia Camps Herrero, Francesco Sardanelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 8% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,480,397
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#205
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,556
of 456,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.