↓ Skip to main content

Method: a single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping method for Wheat streak mosaic virus

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Genetics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Method: a single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping method for Wheat streak mosaic virus
Published in
Investigative Genetics, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2041-2223-3-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M Rogers, Mark Payton, Robert W Allen, Ulrich Melcher, Jesse Carver, Jacqueline Fletcher

Abstract

The September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon increased the concern about the potential for terrorist attacks on many vulnerable sectors of the US, including agriculture. The concentrated nature of crops, easily obtainable biological agents, and highly detrimental impacts make agroterrorism a potential threat. Although procedures for an effective criminal investigation and attribution following such an attack are available, important enhancements are still needed, one of which is the capability for fine discrimination among pathogen strains. The purpose of this study was to develop a molecular typing assay for use in a forensic investigation, using Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) as a model plant virus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Genetics
#76
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,602
of 176,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Genetics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.