You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents for people with acute traumatic brain injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010904.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Han Chen, Zhi Song, Jane A Dennis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 30% |
| Tuvalu | 1 | 3% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 294 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 122 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 131 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,553,233
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,426
of 12,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,738
of 467,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.