↓ Skip to main content

Cost or revenue: is diabetes prevention doomed due to misalignment of incentives?

Overview of attention for article published in Family Medicine and Community Health, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost or revenue: is diabetes prevention doomed due to misalignment of incentives?
Published in
Family Medicine and Community Health, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/fmch-2019-000274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arch G Mainous 3rd, Sandhya Yadav, Zhigang Xie, Jinhai Huo

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,672,822
of 23,937,668 outputs
Outputs from Family Medicine and Community Health
#218
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,787
of 461,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Medicine and Community Health
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,937,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.