↓ Skip to main content

Serum profiling by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a diagnostic tool for domoic acid toxicosis in California sea lions

Overview of attention for article published in Proteome Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum profiling by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a diagnostic tool for domoic acid toxicosis in California sea lions
Published in
Proteome Science, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-5956-10-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin A Neely, Jennifer L Soper, Denise J Greig, Kevin P Carlin, Elizabeth G Favre, Frances MD Gulland, Jonas S Almeida, Michael G Janech

Abstract

There are currently no reliable markers of acute domoic acid toxicosis (DAT) for California sea lions. We investigated whether patterns of serum peptides could diagnose acute DAT. Serum peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry from 107 sea lions (acute DAT n = 34; non-DAT n = 73). Artificial neural networks (ANN) were trained using MALDI-TOF data. Individual peaks and neural networks were qualified using an independent test set (n = 20).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
India 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 49%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 23%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2012.
All research outputs
#6,776,135
of 12,503,295 outputs
Outputs from Proteome Science
#68
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,102
of 118,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteome Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,503,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them