You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic stability requirements during gait and standing exergames on the wii fit® system in the elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-9-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cyril Duclos, Carole Miéville, Dany Gagnon, Catherine Leclerc |
| Abstract |
In rehabilitation, training intensity is usually adapted to optimize the trained system to attain better performance (overload principle). However, in balance rehabilitation, the level of intensity required during training exercises to optimize improvement in balance has rarely been studied, probably due to the difficulty in quantifying the stability level during these exercises. The goal of the present study was to test whether the stabilizing/destabilizing forces model could be used to analyze how stability is challenged during several exergames, that are more and more used in balance rehabilitation, and a dynamic functional task, such as gait. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Libya | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 34 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,135,663
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#153
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,925
of 176,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.