You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Substantial improvements not seen in health behaviors following corner store conversions in two Latino food swamps
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-016-3074-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander N. Ortega, Stephanie L. Albert, Alec M. Chan-Golston, Brent A. Langellier, Deborah C. Glik, Thomas R. Belin, Rosa Elena Garcia, Ron Brookmeyer, Mienah Z. Sharif, Michael L. Prelip |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Researcher | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 18% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#496,933
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#468
of 17,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,286
of 324,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#12
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.