↓ Skip to main content

Genetic screens in isogenic mammalian cell lines without single cell cloning

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic screens in isogenic mammalian cell lines without single cell cloning
Published in
Nature Communications, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14620-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C. DeWeirdt, Annabel K. Sangree, Ruth E. Hanna, Kendall R. Sanson, Mudra Hegde, Christine Strand, Nicole S. Persky, John G. Doench

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,072,475
of 17,377,895 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,370
of 34,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,472
of 334,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,377,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them