↓ Skip to main content

The European quality of care pathways (EQCP) study on the impact of care pathways on interprofessional teamwork in an acute hospital setting: study protocol: for a cluster randomised controlled trial…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The European quality of care pathways (EQCP) study on the impact of care pathways on interprofessional teamwork in an acute hospital setting: study protocol: for a cluster randomised controlled trial and evaluation of implementation processes
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svin Deneckere, Martin Euwema, Cathy Lodewijckx, Massimiliano Panella, Walter Sermeus, Kris Vanhaecht

Abstract

Although care pathways are often said to promote teamwork, high-level evidence that supports this statement is lacking. Furthermore, knowledge on conditions and facilitators for successful pathway implementation is scarce. The objective of the European Quality of Care Pathway (EQCP) study is therefore to study the impact of care pathways on interprofessional teamwork and to build up understanding on the implementation process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 116 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,544
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,363
of 176,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.