↓ Skip to main content

Blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnancy to improve the detection and monitoring of hypertension (the BUMP 1 and 2 trials): protocol for two linked randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnancy to improve the detection and monitoring of hypertension (the BUMP 1 and 2 trials): protocol for two linked randomised controlled trials
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greig Dougall, Marloes Franssen, Katherine Louise Tucker, Ly-Mee Yu, Lisa Hinton, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Lucy Abel, Julie Allen, Rebecca Jane Band, Alison Chisholm, Carole Crawford, Marcus Green, Sheila Greenfield, James Hodgkinson, Paul Leeson, Christine McCourt, Lucy MacKillop, Alecia Nickless, Jane Sandall, Mauro Santos, Lionel Tarassenko, Carmelo Velardo, Hannah Wilson, Lucy Yardley, Lucy Chappell, Richard J McManus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#630,764
of 15,743,265 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,262
of 14,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,784
of 295,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#24
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,743,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.