↓ Skip to main content

Local excision after preoperative chemoradiation for T2 and T3 rectal cancers: is the wait over?

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 tweeters
Title
Local excision after preoperative chemoradiation for T2 and T3 rectal cancers: is the wait over?
Published in
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30001-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahima Dossa, Sergio A Acuna, Nancy N Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,044,176
of 15,132,971 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#238
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,434
of 273,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#22
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,132,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.