↓ Skip to main content

A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medical Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 448)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
516 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
20 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1750 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2090 Mendeley
Title
A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)
Published in
Military Medical Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40779-020-0233-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Hui Jin, Lin Cai, Zhen-Shun Cheng, Hong Cheng, Tong Deng, Yi-Pin Fan, Cheng Fang, Di Huang, Lu-Qi Huang, Qiao Huang, Yong Han, Bo Hu, Fen Hu, Bing-Hui Li, Yi-Rong Li, Ke Liang, Li-Kai Lin, Li-Sha Luo, Jing Ma, Lin-Lu Ma, Zhi-Yong Peng, Yun-Bao Pan, Zhen-Yu Pan, Xue-Qun Ren, Hui-Min Sun, Ying Wang, Yun-Yun Wang, Hong Weng, Chao-Jie Wei, Dong-Fang Wu, Jian Xia, Yong Xiong, Hai-Bo Xu, Xiao-Mei Yao, Yu-Feng Yuan, Tai-Sheng Ye, Xiao-Chun Zhang, Ying-Wen Zhang, Yin-Gao Zhang, Hua-Min Zhang, Yan Zhao, Ming-Juan Zhao, Hao Zi, Xian-Tao Zeng, Yong-Yan Wang, Xing-Huan Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 516 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,090 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2090 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 237 11%
Student > Master 212 10%
Researcher 199 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 7%
Other 136 7%
Other 438 21%
Unknown 731 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 491 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 139 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 124 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 67 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 3%
Other 395 19%
Unknown 811 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 490. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#54,602
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Military Medical Research
#1
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,447
of 475,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medical Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.