↓ Skip to main content

Does pay-for-performance in primary care save lives?

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does pay-for-performance in primary care save lives?
Published in
The Lancet, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00550-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Roland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Other 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Other 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 41%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Unspecified 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Other 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#791,949
of 13,162,426 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,335
of 31,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,705
of 263,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#197
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,162,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.