↓ Skip to main content

A short-term in situ CO2 enrichment experiment on Heron Island (GBR)

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A short-term in situ CO2 enrichment experiment on Heron Island (GBR)
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00413
Pubmed ID
Authors

David I. Kline, Lida Teneva, Kenneth Schneider, Thomas Miard, Aaron Chai, Malcolm Marker, Kent Headley, Brad Opdyke, Merinda Nash, Matthew Valetich, Jeremy K. Caves, Bayden D. Russell, Sean D. Connell, Bill J. Kirkwood, Peter Brewer, Edward Peltzer, Jack Silverman, Ken Caldeira, Robert B. Dunbar, Jeffrey R. Koseff, Stephen G. Monismith, B. Greg Mitchell, Sophie Dove, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg

Abstract

Ocean acidification poses multiple challenges for coral reefs on molecular to ecological scales, yet previous experimental studies of the impact of projected CO₂ concentrations have mostly been done in aquarium systems with corals removed from their natural ecosystem and placed under artificial light and seawater conditions. The Coral-Proto Free Ocean Carbon Enrichment System (CP-FOCE) uses a network of sensors to monitor conditions within each flume and maintain experimental pH as an offset from environmental pH using feedback control on the injection of low pH seawater. Carbonate chemistry conditions maintained in the -0.06 and -0.22 pH offset treatments were significantly different than environmental conditions. The results from this short-term experiment suggest that the CP-FOCE is an important new experimental system to study in situ impacts of ocean acidification on coral reef ecosystems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Mexico 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Belgium 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 160 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 29%
Researcher 48 26%
Student > Master 23 13%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 51%
Environmental Science 37 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 16%
Unspecified 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2012.
All research outputs
#709,103
of 12,476,446 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,783
of 57,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,249
of 118,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,476,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.