↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of H1N1/09 monovalent and trivalent influenza vaccines against hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed H1N1/09 influenza in Australia: A test-negative case control study

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of H1N1/09 monovalent and trivalent influenza vaccines against hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed H1N1/09 influenza in Australia: A test-negative case control study
Published in
Vaccine, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen C. Cheng, Tom Kotsimbos, Heath A. Kelly, Louis B. Irving, Simon D. Bowler, Simon G.A. Brown, Mark Holmes, Christine R. Jenkins, Philip Thompson, Graham Simpson, Richard Wood-Baker, Sanjaya N. Senanayake, Stephen J. Brady, David L. Paterson, Peter A. Wark, John W. Upham, Tony M. Korman, Dominic E. Dwyer, Grant W. Waterer, Paul M. Kelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Unspecified 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 6 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,874,243
of 12,269,624 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#9,900
of 10,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,854
of 275,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#165
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,269,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.