↓ Skip to main content

Area-Level Disparities of Public Open Space: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis in Metropolitan Melbourne

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Policy and Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Area-Level Disparities of Public Open Space: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis in Metropolitan Melbourne
Published in
Urban Policy and Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1080/08111146.2014.974747
Authors

Suzanne Mavoa, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Hannah M. Badland, Melanie Davern, Xiaoqi Feng, Thomas Astell-Burt, Billie Giles-Corti

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 33%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Design 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 7 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,486,349
of 12,187,464 outputs
Outputs from Urban Policy and Research
#103
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,760
of 278,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Policy and Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,187,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.