↓ Skip to main content

Robustness of proxy‐based climate field reconstruction methods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Robustness of proxy‐based climate field reconstruction methods
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, June 2007
DOI 10.1029/2006jd008272
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Scott Rutherford, Eugene Wahl, Caspar Ammann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 121 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Master 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Professor 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 44%
Environmental Science 25 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Engineering 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,536
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,025
of 79,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#44
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.