↓ Skip to main content

From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these…

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-1286-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer V. E. Brown, Paul E. S. Crampton, Gabrielle M. Finn, Jessica E. Morgan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 6 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,401,168
of 16,011,957 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#279
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,282
of 308,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,011,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them