↓ Skip to main content

No water in the oasis: the Chilean Spring of 2019–2020

Overview of attention for article published in Social Movement Studies, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 429)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
No water in the oasis: the Chilean Spring of 2019–2020
Published in
Social Movement Studies, February 2020
DOI 10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737
Authors

Nicolás M. Somma, Matías Bargsted, Rodolfo Disi Pavlic, Rodrigo M. Medel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#940,685
of 15,439,375 outputs
Outputs from Social Movement Studies
#31
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,553
of 287,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Movement Studies
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,439,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.