You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magnetometer with nitrogen-vacancy center in a bulk diamond for detecting magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-59064-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihiro Kuwahata, Takahiro Kitaizumi, Kota Saichi, Takumi Sato, Ryuji Igarashi, Takeshi Ohshima, Yuta Masuyama, Takayuki Iwasaki, Mutsuko Hatano, Fedor Jelezko, Moriaki Kusakabe, Takashi Yatsui, Masaki Sekino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 57 | 31% |
| Engineering | 29 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,903,324
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#31,195
of 133,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,882
of 466,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#984
of 4,013 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,013 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.