↓ Skip to main content

Early versus late erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus late erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004865.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay M Aher, Arne Ohlsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,766,114
of 16,414,462 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,394
of 11,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,814
of 323,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,414,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.