↓ Skip to main content

Clientelism's Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Political Science, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clientelism's Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics
Published in
Annual Review of Political Science, February 2020
DOI 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032657
Authors

Allen Hicken, Noah L. Nathan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 53%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Unspecified 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#937,218
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Political Science
#126
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,523
of 482,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Political Science
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.