You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001122.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esmée M Bordewijk, Ka Ying Bonnie Ng, Lidija Rakic, Ben Willem J Mol, Julie Brown, Tineke J Crawford, Madelon van Wely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 92 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,287,379
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,757
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,077
of 481,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.