↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic imaging for spinal disorders in the elderly: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic imaging for spinal disorders in the elderly: a narrative review
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-20-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

John AM Taylor, André Bussières

Abstract

The high prevalence of neck and low back pain in the rapidly aging population is associated with significant increases in health care expenditure. While spinal imaging can be useful to identify less common causes of neck and back pain, overuse and misuse of imaging services has been widely reported. This narrative review aims to provide primary care providers with an overview of available imaging studies with associated potential benefits, adverse effects, and costs for the evaluation of neck and back pain disorders in the elderly population. While the prevalence of arthritis and degenerative disc disease increase with age, fracture, infection, and tumor remain uncommon. Prevalence of other conditions such as spinal stenosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) also increase with age and demand special considerations. Radiography of the lumbar spine is not recommended for the early management of non-specific low back pain in adults under the age of 65. Aside from conventional radiography for suspected fracture or arthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) offer better characterization of most musculoskeletal diseases. If available, MRI is usually preferred over CT because it involves less radiation exposure and has better soft-tissue visualization. Use of subspecialty radiologists to interpret diagnostic imaging studies is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 19 19%