↓ Skip to main content

Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, January 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006
Authors

Peter Howley, Cathal O. Donoghue, Stephen Hynes

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,819,267
of 15,398,206 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#650
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,840
of 286,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,398,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.