↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the CONCARDPCI)
Published in
BMJ Open, February 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031995
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tone M Norekvål, Heather G Allore, Bjørn Bendz, Cathrine Bjorvatn, Britt Borregaard, Gunhild Brørs, Christi Deaton, Nina Fålun, Heather Hadjistavropoulos, Tina Birgitte Hansen, Stig Igland, Alf Inge Larsen, Pernille Palm, Trond Røed Pettersen, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Jan Schjøtt, Rikke Søgaard, Irene Valaker, Ann Dorthe Zwisler, Svein Rotevatn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 32%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Psychology 3 16%
Computer Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,764,861
of 15,895,227 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,231
of 14,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,335
of 304,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#151
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,895,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.