You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a protocol of a multicentre cohort study on continuity of care, health literacy, adherence and costs at all care levels (the CONCARDPCI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031995 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tone M Norekvål, Heather G Allore, Bjørn Bendz, Cathrine Bjorvatn, Britt Borregaard, Gunhild Brørs, Christi Deaton, Nina Fålun, Heather Hadjistavropoulos, Tina Birgitte Hansen, Stig Igland, Alf Inge Larsen, Pernille Palm, Trond Røed Pettersen, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Jan Schjøtt, Rikke Søgaard, Irene Valaker, Ann Dorthe Zwisler, Svein Rotevatn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,169,551
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#9,234
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,457
of 476,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#202
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.