↓ Skip to main content

How causal information affects decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 156)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How causal information affects decisions
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-0206-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Zheng, Jessecae K. Marsh, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Samantha Kleinberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#277,838
of 15,382,467 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#15
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,348
of 286,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,382,467 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them