↓ Skip to main content

How causal information affects decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 371)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How causal information affects decisions
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-0206-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Zheng, Jessecae K. Marsh, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Samantha Kleinberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 12%
Computer Science 8 11%
Engineering 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Decision Sciences 3 4%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#429,412
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#31
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,651
of 482,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.