↓ Skip to main content

Determinants and Consequences of Dispersal in Vertebrates with Complex Life Cycles: A Review of Pond-Breeding Amphibians

Overview of attention for article published in The Quarterly Review of Biology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants and Consequences of Dispersal in Vertebrates with Complex Life Cycles: A Review of Pond-Breeding Amphibians
Published in
The Quarterly Review of Biology, March 2020
DOI 10.1086/707862
Authors

Cayuela, Hugo, Valenzuela-Sánchez, Andrés, Teulier, Loïc, Martínez-Solano, Íñigo, Léna, Jean-Paul, Merilä, Juha, Muths, Erin, Shine, Richard, Quay, Ludivine, Denoël, Mathieu, Clobert, Jean, Schmidt, Benedikt R.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 46%
Environmental Science 25 26%
Computer Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,649,045
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from The Quarterly Review of Biology
#73
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,926
of 338,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quarterly Review of Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them