↓ Skip to main content

Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004992.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger J Hart, Martha Hickey, Panos Maouris, William Buckett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Other 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Master 19 9%
Other 58 27%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 51%
Psychology 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 63 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,813,186
of 22,130,231 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,280
of 12,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,354
of 282,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,130,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.