↓ Skip to main content

Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004992.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger J Hart, Martha Hickey, Panos Maouris, William Buckett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 14 10%
Other 42 30%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 59%
Psychology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 27 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,142,994
of 15,625,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,726
of 11,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,224
of 268,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.