↓ Skip to main content

Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004992.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger J Hart, Martha Hickey, Panos Maouris, William Buckett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Other 40 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 61%
Unspecified 14 14%
Psychology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,353,154
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,550
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,804
of 264,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.