| Title |
Umbilical cord-derived Wharton’s jelly for regenerative medicine applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-1553-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gupta, Ashim, El-Amin, Saadiq F., Levy, Howard J., Sze-Tu, Rebecca, Ibim, Sobrasua E., Maffulli, Nicola |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,967,820
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#76
of 1,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,898
of 464,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.