You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
1052: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE TOP SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCERS OVER TIME AT THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1097/01.ccm.0000643144.99355.70 |
| Authors |
Viren Kaul, Sapna Kudchadkar, Tamas Szakmany, Neha Dangayach, Ashley DePriest, Matthew Duprey, Ruth Kleinpell, Kenneth Tegtmeyer, Christopher Carroll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 78% |
| Armenia | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,095,740
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,113
of 9,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,573
of 482,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#71
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.