↓ Skip to main content

1052

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1052
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1097/01.ccm.0000643144.99355.70
Authors

Viren Kaul, Sapna Kudchadkar, Tamas Szakmany, Neha Dangayach, Ashley DePriest, Matthew Duprey, Ruth Kleinpell, Kenneth Tegtmeyer, Christopher Carroll

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Egypt 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Mathematics 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,518,431
of 15,665,714 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,334
of 7,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,989
of 254,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#55
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,665,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.