↓ Skip to main content

The genome of the polar eukaryotic microalga Coccomyxa subellipsoidea reveals traits of cold adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The genome of the polar eukaryotic microalga Coccomyxa subellipsoidea reveals traits of cold adaptation
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-r39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Blanc, Irina Agarkova, Jane Grimwood, Alan Kuo, Andrew Brueggeman, David D Dunigan, James Gurnon, Istvan Ladunga, Erika Lindquist, Susan Lucas, Jasmyn Pangilinan, Thomas Pröschold, Asaf Salamov, Jeremy Schmutz, Donald Weeks, Takashi Yamada, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky, Jean-Michel Claverie, Igor V Grigoriev, James L Van Etten

Abstract

Little is known about the mechanisms of adaptation of life to the extreme environmental conditions encountered in polar regions. Here we present the genome sequence of a unicellular green alga from the division chlorophyta, Coccomyxa subellipsoidea C-169, which we will hereafter refer to as C-169. This is the first eukaryotic microorganism from a polar environment to have its genome sequenced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 266 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Professor 15 5%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 21%
Environmental Science 12 4%
Computer Science 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 51 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,428
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,952
of 178,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.