↓ Skip to main content

Consumo intensivo de alcohol y cannabis, y prácticas sexuales de riesgo en estudiantes universitarios

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumo intensivo de alcohol y cannabis, y prácticas sexuales de riesgo en estudiantes universitarios
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucía Moure-Rodríguez, Sonia Doallo, Pablo Juan-Salvadores, Montserrat Corral, Fernando Cadaveira, Francisco Caamaño-Isorna

Abstract

To determine the incidence of unsafe sex among university students and its association with heavy episodic drinking (HED) and cannabis use. A cohort study was carried out from 2005 to 2011 among university students of the Compostela Cohort (n=517). HED was measured using the third question of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Unsafe sex was considered to be sex under the influence of alcohol (SUA) and sex without a condom (SWC). Logistic regression models were created. The incidence of SUA was 40.9% for women and 53.0% for men, while the SWC incidence ranged from 13.7% for women to 25.7% for men. HED and cannabis use were associated with SUA in both women (OR=2.08, 95% CI: 1.03-4.21; OR=2.78, 95%CI: 1.57-4.92) and men (OR=4.74 (95%CI: 1.49-15.09; OR=4.37, 95%CI: 1.17- 16.36). Moreover, cannabis use in women was associated with SWC (OR=2.96, 95%CI: 1.52-5.75). The population attributable fractions of SUA for HED were 24.7% and 52.9% for women and men, respectively. HED and cannabis use represent a public health problem due to their association with a variety of problems, including engagement in unsafe sex. Our results suggest that a significant proportion of unsafe sex could be avoided by reducing this consumption pattern of alcohol.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 21%
Psychology 19 15%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 29 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,225,628
of 12,519,100 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#265
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,969
of 265,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,100 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.