↓ Skip to main content

How Many “Nones” Are There? Explaining the Discrepancies in Survey Estimates

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Religious Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 236)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Many “Nones” Are There? Explaining the Discrepancies in Survey Estimates
Published in
Review of Religious Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1007/s13644-020-00400-7
Authors

Ryan P. Burge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#640,990
of 16,387,457 outputs
Outputs from Review of Religious Research
#9
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,838
of 257,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Religious Research
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,387,457 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.