You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: a review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101456 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franco M Impellizzeri, Denise M Jones, Damian Griffin, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Kristian Thorborg, Kay M Crossley, Michael P Reiman, Mark James Scholes, Eva Ageberg, Rintje Agricola, Mario Bizzini, Nancy Bloom, Nicola C Casartelli, Laura E Diamond, Hendrik Paulus Dijkstra, Stephanie Di Stasi, Michael Drew, Daniel Jonah Friedman, Matthew Freke, Boris Gojanovic, Joshua J Heerey, Per Hölmich, Michael A Hunt, Lasse Ishøi, Ara Kassarjian, Matthew King, Peter R Lawrenson, Michael Leunig, Cara L Lewis, Kristian Marstrand Warholm, Sue Mayes, Håvard Moksnes, Andrea Britt Mosler, May Arna Risberg, Adam Semciw, Andreas Serner, Pim van Klij, Tobias Wörner, Joanne Kemp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 22% |
| Australia | 9 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 58% |
| Scientists | 22 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,023,200
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,775
of 6,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,586
of 384,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#25
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.