The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ag(I) ions working as a hole-transfer mediator in photoelectrocatalytic water oxidation on WO3 film
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-14775-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tae Hwa Jeon, Damián Monllor–Satoca, Gun–hee Moon, Wooyul Kim, Hyoung–il Kim, Detlef W. Bahnemann, Hyunwoong Park, Wonyong Choi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Macao | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 20 | 31% |
Materials Science | 9 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,983,338
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#40,440
of 47,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,798
of 360,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,344
of 1,555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.