| Title |
Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1148/radiol.2020200432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yicheng Fang, Huangqi Zhang, Jicheng Xie, Minjie Lin, Lingjun Ying, Peipei Pang, Wenbin Ji |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,311 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 453 | 20% |
| United States | 118 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 44 | 2% |
| Spain | 35 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 1% |
| Mexico | 29 | 1% |
| Australia | 24 | 1% |
| Canada | 22 | <1% |
| Kuwait | 21 | <1% |
| Other | 147 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1387 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2115 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 99 | 4% |
| Scientists | 84 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2287 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 271 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 238 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 232 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 191 | 8% |
| Other | 141 | 6% |
| Other | 470 | 21% |
| Unknown | 744 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 595 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 137 | 6% |
| Engineering | 117 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 95 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 3% |
| Other | 408 | 18% |
| Unknown | 863 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1871. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,939
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#6
of 9,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296
of 403,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#4
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.