↓ Skip to main content

Long-term Effect of Intraocular Lens vs Contact Lens Correction on Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery During Infancy

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term Effect of Intraocular Lens vs Contact Lens Correction on Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery During Infancy
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott R. Lambert, George Cotsonis, Lindreth DuBois, Azhar Nizam, Stacey J. Kruger, E. Eugenie Hartmann, David R. Weakley, Carolyn Drews-Botsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 52 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 51 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,736,551
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#881
of 6,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,638
of 401,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#16
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.